Royd Doublets - Worth buying?
I may have an opportunity to get a pair of Royd Doublets (if the seller is sensible about the price) and was wondering if they were considered a good speaker. I currently have the Minstrels. Would the Doublet be a worthwhile improvement over the Minstrels? I intend to drive them using NVA A40 MK2 mono blocs but am concerned they may be underpowered for the Doublet based on their spec.
Recommend Amplifier Power 50 to 150 Watts
Sensitivity 89 dB 1 watt @ 1 metre
Power Handling 200 watts
Nominal Impedance 6 ohms
Also, did the drivers have rubber or foam surrounds and how durable are they?
What would a fair price be for a good condition Doublets finished in Mahogany? The seller is asking €490 which I think is too high.
Any opinions appreciated.
Recommend Amplifier Power 50 to 150 Watts
Sensitivity 89 dB 1 watt @ 1 metre
Power Handling 200 watts
Nominal Impedance 6 ohms
Also, did the drivers have rubber or foam surrounds and how durable are they?
What would a fair price be for a good condition Doublets finished in Mahogany? The seller is asking €490 which I think is too high.
Any opinions appreciated.
Comments
That does seem a lot for Doublets, but maybe they're rare where you are?
I have read people preferring Doublets and others preferring Minstrels. My guess is (I never owned Doublets) the Minstrels are more lively - partly because they're easier to drive and partly the raucous tweeter. I imagine the Doublet is more refined, grown up.
I would agree that the A40s won't make the Doublets sing properly although they will drive them OK. Doublet's are 2.5 way speakers, so need a little welly behind them.
I set up a system for my folks with Audiovector Si3 speakers (91db) with A40mk1 for the tweaters and A60 for the mid/bass drivers.
After the A60s blew 2 days in I ended up driving them with just the A40s. They sounded fine, but not brilliant. If you open up an A40 the transformers are frankly tiny (50va I think - they are in Greece so can't check). I think I have read that they were originally intended for bi-amping tweeters.
It wasn't just the tweeters that were leaping about.
* wtf do i mean by that?
There was a clear difference when I had the A60s in with the A40s in my folk's system compared to just the A40s, all in the bass area. While with just the A40s the sound was fine and perfectly enjoyable, it wasn't doing any kind of justice to what the speakers were capable of. The bass was uncontrolled and made the overall sound a little messy.
I suppose we're just wrestling with ways of expressing degrees of difference, which we agree is somewhere between non existent and total, depending partly on which NVAs are being compared and partly on speaker choice.
Would be interesting* to compare Dave's old TDS with the more modern statement range. Or any of the old NVA stuff with the new.
*Well, a bit.
I have just posted the exact same thing in another thread
Likewise, I did get to compare my old aluminium chassis AP20 to my mate's newer, acrylic AP30. The AP30 should have been much better, but it wasn't (except for maybe a touch more control at higher volume). My AP20 played more delicately and sounded quicker. It was a special little amp, that one.
Very interesting indeed.
Minstrels are perfect.