What's a pre-amp...?
;-) An almost genuine question...
Really I'm seeking clarity on what are the purposeS of a preamp.
I know that they:
1. Offer source selection and;
2. Control volume.
But I suspect they do other things too (some sort of buffering perhaps...?)...
I ask because I do not need the first 2 things. I have only one source and am entirely happy with JRiver's digital volume control. Until a few years ago I used a passive preamp (which I imagine does do only the first 2 things (the second by attenuation)).
When I went media-PC only I spent a while comparing JRiver's digital volume with the stepped attenuators in my passive pre- and decided that the digital volume was at worst as good as the SAs in the passive pre-. Hence I sold the passive pre-. Now my media PC feeds my power amp (currently the lovely One4 SECA) directly. Jriver hardly ever crashes, and when it has done it has always crashed silently, so I'm not worried about speaker damage issues.
But all this talk of SECA preamps is making me wonder what things an active design brings to the party.
Any information muchly appreciated. :-)
Really I'm seeking clarity on what are the purposeS of a preamp.
I know that they:
1. Offer source selection and;
2. Control volume.
But I suspect they do other things too (some sort of buffering perhaps...?)...
I ask because I do not need the first 2 things. I have only one source and am entirely happy with JRiver's digital volume control. Until a few years ago I used a passive preamp (which I imagine does do only the first 2 things (the second by attenuation)).
When I went media-PC only I spent a while comparing JRiver's digital volume with the stepped attenuators in my passive pre- and decided that the digital volume was at worst as good as the SAs in the passive pre-. Hence I sold the passive pre-. Now my media PC feeds my power amp (currently the lovely One4 SECA) directly. Jriver hardly ever crashes, and when it has done it has always crashed silently, so I'm not worried about speaker damage issues.
But all this talk of SECA preamps is making me wonder what things an active design brings to the party.
Any information muchly appreciated. :-)
Comments
I'd still like to know (though I admit hearing is more important!) what cutting the interconnects between my media PC and power amp and inserting into the gap a preamp (of whatever type) would bring to my already delightful party. I guess I just need to try it at some point.
Clearly it would do something. And possibly something good. :-)
I'm just being curious, genuinely, not challenging. :-)
I love the way that makes it sound like a frequent calamity...! ;-)
Dave's speaker woes...
Never had you as a CV user, Dave...!
BTW, my sources elsewhere are informing me that the defining characteristics of a pre-amp can include:
7) easier connection to multiple power amps, if required.
8) increased compatability over power amps.
9) Remote control (for sources without)
IME, if you are a single source user and have good compatability between your source and power amp along with an excellent volume control, there is no need for a pre-amp at all.
BUT, I'm a multiple source user and.....did someone mention a SECA pre?
O:-)
Thanks for that. I am hoping that I don't need one. No preamp is, I suspect, somewhat cheaper than a good preamp.
It's this matching source and power amp that interests me.
From what I'm understanding from various places, this might be a measurement thing.
My "source" is in fact the Xonar Essence STX sound card inside the NVA TFS media PC (as created by Jason "Figlet").
The specs for that are here... clicky
I think Jason played around a lot with the swappable OPAMPS during the design process. I can't remember which ones he ended up using. Do these effect specs relevant to the preamp...?
My power amp is of course the very nice One4 SECA...
Colin, how able are you to suggest the releveant specs there...?
;-)