Mixed bag of TQ cables
For sale a mixed bag of TQ cable before it was pissed about with.
2M of Ultra Black normally £200 + /M selling for £200.00 a set.
TQ basic Black speaker 2M normally £50/M for sell at £50.00 the set.
Black TQ interconnect normall £280+ a set for £140.00 a set.
Please allow P&P
PM me if interested.
Comments
Yep........Ultra Blacks are damn good.
I had a set before I became poor
Hehe..........I love you all
(*or TQ cables)
If Colin finds some UB interconnects behind his cistern I'd be interested.
Or better, if he comes up with something new and of One4 audio production, and of equal SQ then I will definitely pay him for them. ;-)
Are they Black or Ultrablack?
What more can you say about the bit in brackets ("(well UB but cost is to high)")?
I'm feeling confused.
BTW, I'm less confused now. Colin set me straight via PM. :-)
Had a set of Blacks back in the day (and the IC's too) and very good they were too.
Replacing my Mogami speaker wire with the TQ at one of my Scottish Mafia soiree's was like changing the speakers!
Expecting the Ultra's to be "a wee bit special" with my 300B SET
Currently using home brew Cat5e braided set.
Will post here about them, seems a good place to hang out.
So feeling a bit jealous of your recent purchase.
I will cope!
What more can you say about your Cat5e cable...? Sounds like a...creative application. :-)
Missed this .
What's left, Colin ?
Gaz - the bass of the UB's will be a bit of a shock after the Cat5 DIY - which is otherwise pretty good.
Got the Ultra blacks and the jumpers in this afternoon.
Thanks very much, sound very good indeed and will improve with some time on them I'm sure.
Hope everything went well yesterday.
All the best,
Gary.
I did notice a certain amount of ''secrecy'' when the TQ cables where released and naturally when my own Black IC’ arrived DIY took over and I had a look see.
So I do have some small grasp on the how’s and whys of the construction methods but not the quality or nature of the metals used. BTW I’ve not discussed my findings online or anywhere else and only looked to quell my own curiosity.
I did have one or two surprises at the time of looking but your reasoning became apparent further down the line.
I’m wondering if you’d be up for a more general ‘’sound pipe’’ type discussion where construction could be discussed without touching the materials used?
Maybe we could touch on the golden triangle relationship between inductance, capacitance, resistance and their effects on phase response which your cables seem to have a sensible and effective approach towards balancing.
Could be interesting.
I do realise that you have a commercial interest in such things but a ‘’basic’’ DIY version using off the shelf stuff may be fun.
Other wise
Feel free to ignore
* Quick version:
If I split the jumper cable (2 core wide cable) into 2 seperate 1 core narrow cables, will I impact sound quality?
Directionality of jumper cables is audable, but need the flexibility of splitting into 2 seperate runs so get best sound quality for my speaker setup.
Concerned about altering construction of cable and losing some of the magic...
* Long version (can be ignored if above gets message across!)
As my speakers have biwire terminals(4) and Im feeding a normal 2 core cable into them, the thought is to connect to either top HF terminals or bottom LF, and use jumpers to connect the unused ones?
Been playing about though and that isnt neccesarrily the best sounding connection!
Best results come from Red + speaker lead directly connected to the HF+ terminal, Black - speaker lead directly connected to LF+ So direct connection of speaker cable to +'ve LF and +'ve HF.
So rather than the bottom or top terminals both been used, I connect the cable diaganonally?
Using the jumpers for a "diagonally connected" speaker cable in this way means (in terms of cable directionality...) that one of the jumper connections is running in the wrong direction.
Still sounds great, but depending on what way I connect the jumper cable I hear improvements in either the treble (bass not as good) or the bass (treble not as good) This must be down to cable directionality of the jumpers (or my ears!)
As jumper cable is constructed with wide web between the cores I have to choose between the two. BUT... If the jumper cable was split along its length, I could have the cable directionality running correctly the way I need to connect it.
Question
WIll splitting the jumper cables to make two seperate single core lengths (rather than one wide 2 core cable) have any impact on the cable sound quality?
I ask Col as I know cable construction is all part of the CWC (Colin Wonfor Cable) magic.
I see TQ jumpers are being sold as single lengths, but dont want to split cable if its gonna piss about with what makes it sound so good.
Split it with no neglegable impact? Have to say directionality is noticable with the cable!
Thanks Col.
answered my own question.
Prefer to leave the cable uncut, and can effectively do the same thing by just reversing the black jumper connections on one side of the terminals.
(Wheres my brain when I need it!)
Now I can forget about speaker connections and just just enjoy the music, another box ticked.
I could be wrong about this but I can't see how separating the runs further apart could be bad, especially for a few centimeters. I personally am not concerned about resale value, so I did this:
Works for me!
feel your pain.
My upstairs neighbour is a very loud Polish person, and hearing the language (and boozy parties) muffled through the ceiling is always a hilarious experience. (not)
Some official complaints later and a two hour session of Deep Purple Live in Japan (turned up to 11) cured all that.
Basically I have licence to play as loud as I want...he's slowly getting the message!
Speaker cable burn in...50 or 500 hours for the Ultra Blacks?
Already better than any cable I've had in my sysyem and then some, just wondering if theres more to come?
Thanks Col.
Easy life...? Pffft.
You seem to think I was interested in the SQ of the cables...
Not at all. They will actually be used to bind the hands of naughty school kids.
Thanks Colin. :-)
A little nervous posting about them due to the political / personal unpleasantness that infused Colin's relationship with this company. But, I do feel relief that I have purchased them from Colin himself (as part of his final TQ product purging). Moreover, my understanding is that the UBs are very much Colin's creation.
Having installed them between media PC and Class A power amp, the first things I'm noticing are:
1. More realism(?) in the upper midrange, so things like the leading edge of snares, cymbal rings and some vocal sounds seem more authentic to my ears.
2. Dynamics seem more controlled and smoother...More convincing...louder...? Hard to describe that one.
3. Bass sounds have a more multi-dimensional texture. This characteristic is similar to changes that I've noticed when introducing other Wonforian creations to my system.
The TQ UB IC is subbing in for the NVA SSP that I've been using very happily for 10 years. The UBs are probably the first alternative I've tried that I think I prefer.
I look forward to seeing how the Elsdon Wonfor Audio IC cables compare. :-)
Also worth noting that Colin did actually post them in separate packages. :-D
Love it.